Coercion, Trauma, and Grief in the Interrogation Room: Documenting and Analyzing Cases of False Confessions to Murder of a Family Member

This article examines the phenomenon of false confessions in cases in which individuals were falsely accused of murdering close family members. Drawing on a dataset of twenty-two proven false confession cases, we document how grief, trauma, and coercive interrogation practices intersect to produce highly counterintuitive admissions and narratives of guilt. The study situates these cases within the broader literature on police interrogation and false confessions, highlighting situational risk factors such as lengthy custodial interrogation, sleep deprivation, false evidence ploys, and threats and promises, alongside dispositional vulnerabilities such as youth, mental illness, and trauma exposure. Unlike prior aggregated studies of proven false confessions, this analysis focuses specifically on the unique psychological burden faced by suspects who are grieving the violent death of a loved one and who are often interrogated within hours of the discovery of the crime. Many were misclassified by police as guilty due to their grief reactions, psychologically coerced into falsely confessing and fed crime scene facts and details that were repeated back in their false confessions. Our qualitative and Quantitative data analysis reveal recurring themes that have been well-documented and found in coerced-compliant and coerced-persuaded false confessions. The authors conclude with policy recommendations—including mandatory electronic recording of interrogations—and a call for trauma-informed investigative practices to prevent wrongful convictions rooted in coerced confessions from grief-ridden individuals in a uniquely vulnerable situation.